Thursday, February 11, 2010

True or False: The Ancient Greeks did many experiments to show the nature of matter?

true or false?True or False: The Ancient Greeks did many experiments to show the nature of matter?
True


Much of their science was based on observation, hypothesis and experiment.


http://www.historyworld.net/wrldhis/Plai鈥?/a>True or False: The Ancient Greeks did many experiments to show the nature of matter?
False. They had neither the interest nor necessary technology to conduct experiments.
  • internet security software
  • How many times will or can we born in this world? Is it true or false?

    You really need to change vitamins..........How many times will or can we born in this world? Is it true or false?
    Hopefully I will be reborn with enough sense to ignore questions like this%26gt; or you will come back smart enough to not ask them!How many times will or can we born in this world? Is it true or false?
    It is appointed unto man once to be born...and once to die...believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, read a King James Bible, and you will find the answers you are searching for.
    You make no sense! what will it take for you to go to school you naughty boy?!!
    i thn\ink that u are born as many times neded to have u experiance many diffrent adventures!!
    ';You only live twice'; (Ian Fleming)
    Only one: there is no reincarnation, there is no afterlife.





    The life that you have is the only one that you are going to get. Make the best of it, do not waste it.





    Work hard, to ensure that you can be successful, but still take time to be with your friends and family, and have fun. Enjoy your life.
    You are born once and then you die, so you better make the most of it!
    False, its is said in the bible that on those who died will live with God in other world....or just think of this, if we born again, why do our mind back to zero about the world just like a stranger
    What..... do you want an answer or true or false...make up your damn mind....if Reincarnation exists....maybe next time you will have a brain
    Whether reincarnation is a fact or not has neither been proved not disproved.... therefore it needs to be accepted as a possible theory, just like the Christian theory of afterlife. So it it is not a fact we know about, nor a fiction simply cooked by some author... it is one of the intelligent theories we have evolved regarding what may happen after death.





    If we go by the theory, it states that the soul would have to take as many bodies as necessary until and unless it has completely exhausted 'karma'.... once it has had the totality of the experience required to be able to exhaust 'karma', it would be fully purified and matured to attain 'moksha' which means riddance from repeated births to exhaust 'karma'..... when it attains 'moksha', it would be eligible and inclined to merge with the Supreme Soul that is God.





    The theory is not illogical in any way.... however, no physical proof has ever come our way... all the cases claiming memory of a past birth have not so far been proved to be substantial to scientifically accept the theory. But that is true about all the theories regarding what happens after death.
    Depends on the person and how much the soul has ';matured.';
    According to the latest discovery, you are born and die only once. Enjoy it while it last!
    Only once. We got only one life. Each is unique
    I know someone that was ';born again';


    but they're just as messed up as your question





    as a side note I'd like to add that


    I think they were born again


    because they didn't do it right the first time
    If you are a religious person,please accept my apology before reading.(Totally a WARNING)





    Your life is a part of Science.There is no such thing as Soul/s.So,there is no afterlife.





    I will cut the chase: ONCE
    The beauty of this question is that we don't really know the answer. you will find out that is for sure... The thing I think about is how can we possibly work out all the lessons we have in just one lifetime. There is so much for us to learn, and we only have about 80 to 100 years (if we are lucky to live that long) to learn it all in. Your belief is no different than your faith. We all hope that we don't just turn off like a light switch when we die. Christians believe that we rise to heaven if we accept Christ as our savior. The Hindus believe that we could live and die 10,000 times before we finally attain samadi. Buddhists believe we repeat over and over again until we reach nirvana (or pure Buddha nature). Whatever you feel is OK. Don't let someone else tell you what you should or should not believe. Follow your own path. All paths lead to God. That is if they believe in Love, not hate. Hope you find your answer... Just not too soon... blessings :-)
    Born once physically and born again (spiritually) when you accept Christ as your savior.
    Only one and dont miss it.

    True or False? Coefficients tell the chemist the proportions of the reactants and products in a chemical?

    reaction.True or False? Coefficients tell the chemist the proportions of the reactants and products in a chemical?
    very true.





    say you have a reaction,


    3A+4B -%26gt; 2C





    if you start out with 3 moles A, and 3 moles B, B is the limiting reactant, because you are meant to have more moles B than A in the reaction. using the 3 moles, the coefficient of B is 4. the coefficient of C is half that, 2. so, the moles produced of C will be 1.5 moles if B is the limiting reactant in 3 moles.





    overall, yes, coefficients definitely determine the proportions of reactants/products present.True or False? Coefficients tell the chemist the proportions of the reactants and products in a chemical?
    True true true

    True or False: The best way to pick up a girl is not to try and pick her up at all?

    The guy who shows less desperation is usually the one that shines through the clutter. True or False: The best way to pick up a girl is not to try and pick her up at all?
    Ehh.. sometimes.





    I think the best way for guys to pick up girls is for them to act like themselves.True or False: The best way to pick up a girl is not to try and pick her up at all?
    Absolutely true.


    Always remember that.
    true somewhat, like if youre not obnoxiously trying to get laid. but how will she get to know you if you dont approach her?
    I'm lovin' the new avatar!!





    Unless a guy is right in front of me saying ';I like you'; I don't get the hints.


    So false.



    i like men that don't ';throw'; themselves at my feet. let's make eye contact, have a few conversations and let things happen slowly.
    .. or is completely ignored.
    That is so true
    Hmm...true.
    agreed.


    same goes for girls.

    Why do you think soo many people wrote false Gospels at the time the Gospels were written?

    ....Why do you think soo many people wrote false Gospels at the time the Gospels were written?
    Your question should be broken into two parts.





    Why did so many people wrote false Gospels?





    At what time were the Gospels written?





    The original Gospels were written during the Apostolic age, the false Gospels were written afterward.





    That leaves us with the why. During the time of the Apostles and afterward there was a group called Gnostics. The Gnostics havd a habit of taking existing religions and recreating them in their own image. Taking a popular set of beliefs and stealing the name was a great marketing tool. Others like the religion but wanted to remake in in their own image.Why do you think soo many people wrote false Gospels at the time the Gospels were written?
    I think that they did really. It was more like oral tradition for a while. mark didn't write his until well over 10 years after the Ascension. Probably up to that point, everyone thought Jesus was going to return quicker than that. After the temple was destroyed, any manuscript was probably confiscated, destroyed and the people caught with them were put to death. This went on for 3 or 4 hundred years.





    so there was lots of people who just told the story orally. Some of it may have gotten out of proportion, but sure some are awesomely interesting, and beyond comprehension really. But great things were happening and anything was possible. The dead were raise to life, the ill made better...all kinds of things were still occurring to edify the people.





    Sadly, the gnostic gospels weren't dated to that era, but just shortly afterwards, so the church could not officially authenticate them, and some prudish monk thought them a fabrication of a fevered mind.
    Because the false ';gospels'; were inspired by Satan, who has been a liar and a murderer from the beginning of time.





    EDIT: LOL @ Prometheus ... that's BLATENTLY and DEMONSTRABLY FALSE. We still have manuscripts written by the students of the Apostles, as well as other VERY early manuscripts. These all attest to who wrote the Gospels -- the Apostles Matthew and John, and disciples Mark (who wrote for Peter) and Luke.





    Nice try, but I'm far too educated to be confused by those lies.
    2pe 2:1 But there arose false prophets also among the people, as among you also there shall be false teachers, who shall privily bring in destructive heresies, denying even the Master that bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction. 2pe 2:2 And many shall follow their lascivious doings; by reason of whom the way of the truth shall be evil spoken of.





    Satan knew he had been defeated by Jesus Christ, so he sowed bad seed in the Lord's fields. He wants to make the truth look bad.
    All gospels are considered to be pseudonymous by biblical scholars, including the four in the canon. They wrote under names which lent some authority to what they were trying to say.
    they were just following the fad :]


    same as why everybody bought an ipod


    and why everybody wears the same brand of clothing times change





    fads adapt.
    Because when they were written, they weren't false until an organized religion and not God passed judgment on them.
    Because they realized that religion is the most effective tool to control a population, and so they tried a bunch of things out before one caught on.
    I don't think they were false, I think people had different perspectives on who Jesus was and what his message was.
    People write things that are false now. Have you ever heard of Kent Hovind?
    It's the Neon Bible... Neon Bible... Not much chance for survival if the Neon bible is right.
    You are too ignorant to know you are mocking God.





    Bites to be you.
    why can't we read them all?

    True or false All standard scientific evidence shows that there is no requirement for a God for the life?

    what do you think about this its true or false


    All standard scientific evidence shows that there is no requirement for a God for the life and world we live in.True or false All standard scientific evidence shows that there is no requirement for a God for the life?
    True - All scientific evidence so far shows that there is no requirement for God for life or the world.





    Any scientific evidence showing that God would be needed would be classed as evidence for Gods existence. As no one who says this statement is false can name this evidence, this shows that God is not needed.





    There are many people who do not understand the scientific theories, but just because they do not understand it, does not mean that it must be Gods doing.True or false All standard scientific evidence shows that there is no requirement for a God for the life?
    False. Science observes objects, makes predicitions, gathers empirical evidence to support theories surrounding those predicitions. It does this very well.





    Spiritual traditions are concerned with a felt sense that each individual has that is different from any other. The concept of and symbol of God is a structure that helps a person understand that unique felt sense they have within that science has no tools to address.





    Science and spiritual traditions do not conflict, they complement each other like object and subject respectively. It is people that create conflicts between the two.
    False. Even the study of abiogenesis proves nothing. People don't consider the fact that when attempting to prove abiogenesis, scientists are physically combining elements already in existence, and stimulating them directly. It only proves that humans are smart. It doesn't prove that a God wasn't involved with life existing. Would the amino acids formed by the experiments have existed, if the scientists hadn't made it so?





    It reminds me of that joke where some scientists tell God they can create humans from dirt too, and when they go to do so, God tells them to create their own dirt.





    Abiogenesis is such that it can't be proven, because it involves a scientist's influence.





    So again, false.
    Evidence often suggests that there _is_ a god, goddess, or gods, or some other force at work.





    There is no evidence that supports life being generated spontaneously, only unproven (and untestable) hypothesized ideas (which do not meet the requirements of empirical science).





    (A)Biogenesis is a neat idea, but unproven*. All testing has failed, simply because we do not know the process.





    Additionally, it is not implausible that God uses the same principles that we attempt to explain (as theories) in His works.





    There is no good argument against God, just as there is no way that empirical science can prove there is no God.





    It is all a matter of perspective and opinion.





    *Unproven in the sense that the life created could sustain itself and evolve... The ';life force'; was lacking.
    True.





    Although questions have been raised scientifically such as how the universe began, it is not standard science to say that a higher metaphysical being must have created it. Everything that happens has an explanation or at least a theory which does not include any god.
    I have to disagree with the wording of your statement.





    It is not the job of Science to prove or disprove the ';requirement for a God.'; If Science is not looking for such a requirement, the fact that such a requirement has not been found proves nothing.





    If I am not looking for a missing sock, does the fact that I haven't found it necessarily mean that the sock doesn't exist?
    Science [Scientific Evidence] cannot show whether a God is necessary for life or the world we live in. It is not a Scientific question.


    Science starts with the premise [quite a good one, too, for what it is] that we can observe, analyze, and learn how things work.


    This is, of course, true, up to a point.
    False. Science cannot get around the fact that the universe needs a beginning. But something had to get it started. But they come up with all kinds of reasons and hypotheses to reason God out. But all fail. Some, like Steven Hawking even lie in their theories. But the truth always bears out. And one day science will have to recant most of their notions.
    That is false. Actually the opposite is true. Science is showing that there had to be a life giver, first cause, intelligent designer or what ever you want to call it. We call Him the Almighty Creator, Living God, Maker of the universe. If you want a name this scripture will help.


    (Psalm 83:18) 18聽That people may know that you, whose name is Jehovah, You alone are the Most High over all the earth.
    scientific data with science, and faith with spiritual belief are mutually exclusive.





    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/200鈥?/a>





    No one would even touch this debate. Except people who dont understand science, and people are arent secure in thier faith.
    There has yet to be discovered any law of nature or fact of life requiring the existence of supernatural creators or other magical entities. So that would be ';true';.
    True. But there is no proof AGAINST one. That's what faith is about. Belief, even without evidence.





    I am atheist, however. But I respect others choice of religion.
    False. Science is the study of the natural universe in natural terms. Science can make no valid statements one way of the other about anything supernatural.
    Science has no idea what created life, so scientific stands shows that no logical explanation can explain life so God is the plausible explanation at this time.
    True; there is no requirement, just as there is no preclusion.
    That has been obvious for a long time to the most intelligent, educated and objective people who do not allow emotions to rule them.
    No one has ever found evidence that life couldn't possibly come about through natural processes.
    True. Miller-Urey experiment showed that.
    true? Lol i hope you're not one of those crazy religious people who think we do need god for science. Even if we haven't explained everything, we certainly will.
    Its false, Creation is at the start of every process, and in order to Create one needs a Creator..
    absolutely true
    Correct!
    It is 100% true and people have known that for a LONG time. It's not new.
    Is this news to ANYONE?





    Wow.
    Totally false!!!





    If our earth and universe was millions or billions of years old, at the rate that our sun is using up it's fuel, it would have gone out long ago.





    Intelligence cannot come from non-intellegence. Everything that was ever make came about through creation by one that is more Intelligent than the thing being created.





    The reason that there are so many missing links is because they were never there to begin with.





    I think it is very revealing when evolutionary scientists admit that evolution is an unprovable theory, but they don' like the alternative.
    This is false because even Richard Dawkins stated that if ';aliens'; or ';extraterrestrials'; were to come to earth they would probably be viewed as ';God'; or ';gods.'; Many scientist think in this manner.





    Just because your a scientist doesn't mean your anti god. Most scientist just want the hard evidence. They are mostly like agnostics.
    we are humans, there are things we cannot control, like when a parent finds out his child has cancer,he needs a god,he needs to feel that there is hope, that there is a power that might help his child live, thats all.. god is a figment of imagination. like a teddy bear that a child holds onto, or a safety blanket.





    god is nothing but hope,its ur inner strength,ur belief .
    False.


    I thought so . . . as if they have answered all life's questions . . .an they haven't, I think you know that. But look at those who would think that science has come that far!





    With those who would say science knows this; they cannot really be that into science. Maybe the word ';science';, but no where near the information about what they know, and what they don't know.
    False, science is based off of Theories (Educated Opinion) until they are prove to be factual. There are many things in this universe that as humans we do not comprehend or understand.
    false





    there is no evidence for evolution





    its made up theories with no factual evidence
    absolutely FALSE

    WHat do you think of people who lead false accusations that someone is a racist just to get a whoel group to?

    hate them?WHat do you think of people who lead false accusations that someone is a racist just to get a whoel group to?
    boy who cried wolf.......someday they will find someone racist and no one will beleive them cuz they lied so may times...





    kind of like the feminists who said, ';all men are wolves'; and no one wants to listen to them anymoreWHat do you think of people who lead false accusations that someone is a racist just to get a whoel group to?
    Sounds like a Liberal,All minority group activists use this to intimadate others to do their will because they can't rely on their merits.They forget what Martin Luther King said about about the content of their mind not the color of their skin.It justifies their failers,And gives them someone else to blame for them.
    did you ever stop and consider that the someone who did something ';racist'; actually is the source of some of this misunderstanding?


    What if the person did do or say something ';racist'; when you were not looking?





    OR--now please don't misunderstand--or maybe the person interpreting the action misunderstood the intention and you think the purpose was to create animosity.





    Most people want to be loved, not hated. Maybe you need a fresh perspective and I hope you find one here...
    I don't think much of them. Why bother asking a question that you already know the answer to?
    i think that a small number of people who play the race card can make a hole group look bad. if i was in a minority and heard someone do something like that i would be very mad.
  • internet security software
  • True or false--> the constitution gives the president the power to declare war?

    FalseTrue or false--%26gt; the constitution gives the president the power to declare war?
    False, even though that many politicians, from both sides believe other wise.





    The last time Congress declared war was 1941, when we united together as a nation to overcome the axis of evil. Ever since then, Congress has neglected their responsibility for declaring war and giving this power solely over to the President.





    Instead of being patient and waiting for Congressional approval, our leaders have rushed us off into Vietnam, Korea, and Iraq, which did not unite us a nation and earned us global criticism.True or false--%26gt; the constitution gives the president the power to declare war?
    False. The president does not have a right to declare war but presidents have sent troops to a country without declaring war.





    For your information, the Korean War, Vietnam War, Iraqi War, and the Afgan War are not officially wars but instead are police actions since congress has not declared war.
    False. Only Congress has the authority to declare war. The authority that they have officially given the president to declare war is unconstitutional and illegal.





    Love your country. Love your freedom. But the politicians? I wouldn't pee on them if they were on fire....
    False. While the president is commander in chief of the armed forces, the framers of the Constitution gave the power to declare war to Congress. Thus through the system of checks and balances, the ability to declare war rests with Congress.
    If you had read the constitution you would have your answers already.


    Go ahead. Read it. I dare you.


    Oh no, wait, you can't. It will bite you.





    You are lazy.
    Is this your homework ??





    EDIT





    This is not the ';homework help section';, you are posting in the wrong section.
    False, only Congress can declare war and the last time they (formally) declared war was during World War II.
    no, he only has the power to declare a ''police action''
    true, but he needs a merger vote of agreement form congress, and the Senate.





    great trick quistion
    HE says the words, but it has to be agreed upon amongst all the other idiots who are running this country!
    False.
    false

    HP zd8000 gives me false battery status even its fully charged?

    I have problem with my HP zd8000 laptop (intel Pentium 4 3.2 Ghz, 512 ddr2, 80gb hdd, 17 inch widescreen brilliant view lcd). I let it charge until battery reachs 100%, then I unplug it from adapter and it works for about 5 minutes then it goes into standby and when I try to wake it up it says battery is empty and battery meter shows 0 percents. But computer is still working normally so I start 3d mark and activate looping test. Then my computer works for about 30 minutes and battery stays on 0 percents all the time! Finally after thirty sometimes even forty minutes it finally shuts down. Its obvious that battery is quite good but windows battery meter is making mistake reporting empty battery. Please tell me what to do. Is there some other software which will be able to give me more reliable informations about battery status?HP zd8000 gives me false battery status even its fully charged?
    Your battery is damaged obviously. You need a new one.

    The reason for being nice to people is that when you die, they would actually care. True or False?

    Elaborate.The reason for being nice to people is that when you die, they would actually care. True or False?
    False.


    Remember the Golden Rule? :)The reason for being nice to people is that when you die, they would actually care. True or False?
    false ,,part of them wont care
    False
    False. The reason for being nice to people is because it is the right thing to do.
    i would go false,once your dead thats it,people show respect 2 the dead regardless,i think.
    false,you should expect nothing in return
    I think i missed sixty minutes here...





    Life is a struggle without having enemies, so being nice to other people is sensible as well as the right thing to do.
    False, the reason why people are nice to other people is because no human wants to be alone, we're pack animals by nature and even the most anti social person really doesn't want to be alone. Also we can be very opportunistic and when we find someone who can help us get up further in life or give us something we didn't have before, we try our hardest to hold onto them.
    False.............


    Do unto others as you would have then do unto you.......be nice for the sake of being a decent human being...not because you will have a crowd at you funeral.

    Why do some jerks claim that the Catholic doctrine is false?

    some argue that they worship saints and stuff, are they joking? can't be that dumb





    share your thoughtsWhy do some jerks claim that the Catholic doctrine is false?
    Yes they are that stupid my question is are they just stupid or Irrevocably stupid





    Like the idiot below where the hell do they think their bible came from . Its a catholic book made by catholics for catholics. They hijacked it then bastardized its meaningWhy do some jerks claim that the Catholic doctrine is false?
    THE CATHOLIC DOCTRINE IS 1000% FALSE.





    It is the biggest load of BULL on the planet.





    This is exactly what led to the PROTESTANT movement: because the darn papacy couldn't hold back from inventing things in religion and turned Christianity into a mockery.





    Catholics:





    1. worship saints


    2. worship statues


    3. worship images


    4. belief in divinity of mary


    5. invented the eucharist





    Those who follow Catholicism deserve HELL.
    Those type of assertations come from ignorance. Some people believe and repeat everything they hear without questioning it and researching it on their own.





    Catholics do not worship saints anymore than atheists worship satan.


    Catholics have a different set of core beliefs than many other Christians BUT Catholics and Protestants all share one important thing in common, their belief that Jesus Christ is their savior who died on the cross for their sins.








    Also calling people jerks doesn't do much to help your case.
    Definitely not joking. The whole Protestant movement is based on the idea that Catholic teaching is wrong. They claim that they system of cardinals and bishops and saints and Mary have actually put obstacles in the way to finding God. Also, they claim that historically the church has discouraged people from reading the Bible for themselves.





    If you see the movie ';The Other Boleyn Girl'; you will see that England was divided over Catholicism vs. Protestantism.


    One of the biggest Biblical arguments that people will make against Catholicism is the verse


    1Timothy 2:5 For [there is] one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus





    They see praying to saints and statues and Mary as violating that.
    They do that because the Catholics say the Bible is false on its teachings and the Catholic traditions are the correct way to go. Catholics do worship Mary and other people they have made saints years after their death.





    According to the Bible, people are saints while they live, not after they die. Each one of Paul's letters in general was written to the saints in a certain area of the country. They were saints at the time the letters were written.





    The Bible says to pray through Jesus alone. Catholics believe they can pray through the mere dead mortal, Mary.





    Catholics DO worship the clay figures that represent Mary to them or they would not bow down to them. Bowing down as they do constitutes worship.





    Since no statue is God or spiritual, anyone that bows down to statues is worshiping the manmade idols. God is not mortal and therefore mortals cannot bow down to statues and be bowing down to spiritual beings. We are warned so many times about things we use in place of the spiritual beings. When we bow to manmade things, we are worshipping them.
    Some of the Catholic doctrines have no Scriptural basis, and border on heresy, such as praying to the saints (I know you don't call it worship, but we have ONE Mediator between God and man, which is Christ Jesus) and others. But the truth is, some of the Protestant traditions also have no Scriptural basis. None of us is perfect, which is the whole point of Christ's coming and dying for us. What matters is whether you trust wholly in Christ for your salvation, with the evidence of a desire to live a life pleasing to God giving evidence to your faith.
    Catholic doctrine, about the origins of Jesus Christ and divinity of Jesus Christ, is no different than mainstream Protestant Trinitarianism.


    It is silly to say that Catholics are not Christians.


    I grew up Catholic but in my adultlife I have been a spiritual adventurer. I identify now, in middle age, as a Pentecostalist.
    Look in the histories and study harder before you call the ones who say the Catholic doctrines are false to be ';Jerks.'; The truth may boomerang and will make you the one.


    Why don't you visit the different Catholic churches in the Philippines, Mexico, Italy, France, England and USA, See if there is not any that is not named after a saint. What do you think of the people who call the Cross where Jesus Christ was hung a ';HOLY CROSS';? Do not most of them even kneel to the cross even without Jesus? Do not the people call Mary, the Mother of Jesus as ';St. Mary'; and aren't people kneeling praying in front of her relics or pictures?


    First, Jesus claimed that no One goes to the Father unless he passes through him. Then the church declared to go first to Mary, the Mother before you go to Jesus. And then lately many are encourage to pray novenas to other Saints like Saint Jude, St,Anne. St.Peter etc. so that Mother Mary will be appeased and hasten your call for help from Jesus


    Then, the church is also claiming, that St.Joseph, the Carpenter of Nazareth can go directly to God by-passing everyone because he has been loyal and faithful to God and God is indebted to Him for being the foster father of Jesus..


    Is it not really dumb that aside from worshiping Jesus and Mary themselves we still have to devote some obligation to their Hearts and call it ';Sacred';.


    Did not God of Israel declared that only to Him all knees shall bend?


    Why do people walk on their knees to idols that has mouth but cannot speak, who have ears that cannot hear. who have feet but have to be carried so it can be brought around? Why most of the carvers pick some trash of wood leftovers and carved it into statue of a dead and then kneel before his creation?


    Are not all that I mentioned part of the doctrines that are never true?
    No of course not!








    Some people say that Catholics worships saints or worship Mary, but really we only ';worship'; God. We worship the trinity - God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit.





    But, we also honor and revere the holy saints, including Mary. They are a large part of our religion, but we certainly do not worship them in the full sense of the word.








    People who say that are ignorant to the facts. It's just silly to say that. Like saying Oreos must taste like Hydrox - obviously, that person has never tasted Oreos.
    everyone has got and is ***entitled*** to their own opinions--just be secure in your own faith and never mind what other people say. and don't judge them either...just worry about you and what's in YOUR heart...that is all that matters.





    Don't underestimate the power and value of TOLERANCE.


    It is a virtue.
    I used to be catholic..I think you shouldn't call names...especially when you're wrong! Makes you sound like a jerk!


    Regardless of what one says they believe in their heart, if one bows down to an idol (hand made image, statue), the bible condemns that as worship.
    well some do worship saints as well as god be i do believe it is false as i believe all religions are i believe in god just dont think anyone on earth right now knows him or knows stories of what he has done to us like noahs arc and adam and eve sorry dont buy that stuff
    To be honest, i've never heard that. Or at least recently.





    EDIT: These people commenting make me laugh at their ignorance. = )


    I don't worship clay statues, and crucifixes, they just remind me of what/ whom i'm praying to.
    LOL...seriously...do you REALLY CARE??? I dont think so.


    You're just wanting to argue. Truth is...catholicism was done away with when Jesus died and rose again. The veil was ripped in two...just read it...but NOT in a catholic bible..they've taken it all out...go to the original King James version....The reason the veil was torn in two by God was so that man could now come straight to God when praying and repenting..instead of another man. Do your homework instead of supporting a worthless religion.
    Saying that something is false does not make someone a jerk, it simply means they do not agree with it. That said, I'm not sure exactly what your asking in your post, you may want to edit it to make it a little more clear.
    Why do some jerks claim that Islam is false? What about Paganism or Buddhism? It sucks when the insults are thrown your way, eh? People have diverse, conflicting beliefs, and some of those people are vocal about it. =/
    History and the Bible prove that the vast majority of Catholic doctrines are adaptations from paganism.





    http://philologos.org/__eb-ttb/default.h鈥?/a>
    There are jerks of all kinds, of course.... and perhaps one of the largest single groups might be called god-believers.





    Try looking at reality for a change and you might stop attacking each other for petty reasons.
    They claim that, because it is true.





    Catholics don't know the real truth. You cannot go to heaven just because you were so good, and because you did good deeds.


    They deceive themselves when they believe that.
    Well that and all the homo priest and will we soon have nun problems idenified that may have been going on for years? It's all a little fishy to me.
    I think that it is that most of them just don't understand and have never gone to the source to actually learn. God Bless...
    Didn't realize disagreeing with doctrine made someone a jerk.
    I suppose not everybody who works at a soda fountain is Catholic.
    hahahah your dumb.... the flying spaghetti monster is the only way to look you arrogant closed minded byatch
    Its the problem with all religious folk. Especially Christians....


    Intolerance....
    Because some jerks happen to be not catholic.
    Because not all ';jerks'; subscribe to your ill-thought out beliefs, little girl.
    just because someone has a difference of opinion doesn't mean they are jerks.
    Many, out of fear, state that any belief except their own is ';false';.
    they are 100% correct.i suggest you study it out from a non-catholic,unbiased perspective.
    I'd like to know why some ';jerks'; think the Catholic doctrine is God's doctrine. Some people only want to follow God's Word and not man's. I don't think that makes them jerks. I think it makes them wise.

    Can Dramamine provide a false positive for anything else on a drug test?

    Im not positive, but I wouldnt think so. Its almost the same thing as benedryal. And it is an over the counter med.

    Federal Trade Commission: how do they regulate Credit Agencies and false information?

    that repeatedly is accepted by the credit agencies, without timely, accurate, and complete resolve?Federal Trade Commission: how do they regulate Credit Agencies and false information?
    Seems to be a finger pointing game as to who is lying %26amp; false reporting the most! I say all involved are just to generate revenue to the top or be scooped out at the stock market.
  • internet security software
  • If i stop wearing false eyelashes will mine curl back in time?

    i used to have long and curly eyelashes, but the constant wear of false ones has caused my natural lashes to be pushed down. they are still long but not curly. if i stopped wearing false ones will my own in time curl back to how they were, and if so how long till i start seeing a difference as i really wanna stop wearing fake ones as i really dont like how mine look at the moment?If i stop wearing false eyelashes will mine curl back in time?
    You lashes will eventually go back to their original state after they have completed a life cycle - which takes about thirty days.





    If you are looking for a more immediate route, you should try getting them permed! I get mine done because i have long, but super straight lashes, and I love it! The product is called SimplePerm (only know because I wanted to find a tech that used the same product after i moved!) and you can go to their website and find someone who does it in your area.





    If you want to spark the growth, try an eyelash conditioner. I use a natural one that really has helped my mascara abused lashes!

    Anyone taken a preg test that came out with a false negative?

    my period is late and i've taken 2 test both came out negative, has anyone ever taken a test that came out negative but turned out pregnant?Anyone taken a preg test that came out with a false negative?
    Yes, just to prove how inaccurate these things are, I took one of those home pregnancy tests, came back negative ... I was 7 months pregnant. My boyfriend took one, his was positive.Anyone taken a preg test that came out with a false negative?
    yeah... but I'm not sure how common it is. If you're worried, go speak to your doctor, they'll give you another test and they'll be able to tell if you if something else is the matter. You might just be suffering from stress. I think there is a certain amount of time you have to wait if to get a correct answer though. It should say on the packaging.
    yes. I took a test 2 days after my missed period and it was negative. I took another one at 7 days late and it was positive.
    Yes, I did, Wow, was I scared!.....
    Not me, but it happens go for a blood test at the doctor.

    What to do about false noise complaints?

    This girl next door to me once called the cops at night over a noise complaint (I was laughing at the TV for 10-15 seconds max).





    But lately, she calls the cops when I even say anything thats a little above an inside voice.





    Our walls are super thin, and you can hear phone's ringing or someone knocking on the neighbor's door.





    Its driving me insane how she calls the cops....EVEN during the daytime and they still come. I never call the cops on her when she is yelling for her dog to get inside or her friends come over during the daytime talking real loud.





    What can and should I do? If I were to complain on her, do I call 911 or some other number?





    Help!!What to do about false noise complaints?
    Honestly, I'm surprised the cops even show up. They don't have to respond unless the noice is above a certain decible level.





    Talk to your landlord, not her. Tell her she is disrupting your day and causing emotional stress due to her belief that there is excess noise in your apartment. I'm sure you can easily prove that you aren't having parties or doing anything else that would cause noise. The landlord needs to talk to her about appropriate behavior and review the contract rules on noise with her.What to do about false noise complaints?
    File a ';small claims'; lawsuit against your neighbor for ';public and private nuisance';. That will stop your neighbor forever regardless if you win or not. Have the county sheriff serve the complaint after you have files the small claims case. Make-up a dollar amount. IF your neighbor says anything vicious...then file a restraining order against the neighbor. Record notes of each incident you have with this neighbor to include exact words, date, time, witnesses, etc. If you can prove that your neighbor is harassing you file the restraining order first. You can make the neighbors life ';HELL';. JUST DO IT. The county civil clerk will help you. Also, if you can prove that your neighbor has filed a complaint against you unjustifiably...with the police...then file a police report yourself stating that the neighbor had violated the law (criminal law) by making false statements to a peace officer. If the cops don't file your report then file a complaint at the District Attorney's office in your county.
    i have a problem with my neighbours like that. you could try informing the council or environmental health just to explain to them what is going on before she does. she obviously has a problem with you. i would try to avoid her as i confronted mine and i was arrested because she told the police a false story. you could also talk to someone about harrasment.
    I had this problem with a neighbor, so I would blast noise for 15 seconds at different times, I did what they accused me of after they did it to me three times. I would watch for cops while i did it. It worked.
    Fill her keyhole with Krazy Glue.
    do it to her or shoot the ***** lol
    I'd move.
    start complaining about her???
    Damn right....what goes around comes around. I doubt she'll learn anything out of it but ya, you need to start biting back. Just make sure you do it smart. Always be smarter than her. Don't call 911 call your local police department. Good luck! Don't get kicked out of your place over her.
    Turn about is fair play,do unto her as she does to you maybe she will learn a lesson.
    You need to speak to your landlord asap. It sounds to me that this person has problems. Please, never confront her directly, but work something out with your landlord and speak to the Police too. You need to set the record straight and protect yourself. Be careful.
    Yell

    People are making up false and damaging rumors about me?

    There are like one or two guys, who are making up nonsense about me, and its annoying. I get people asking me ';is it true that you...'; or ';i heard this ...'; or ';how on earth can you have done this..';.


    I can't go around telling everyone that I never did that or said anything. It's really getting on my nerves now. I told the guys who are making rubbish up, to please stop. They are now doing it even more.


    What can I do?People are making up false and damaging rumors about me?
    Ignore it. I believe that ppl only feel the need to spread rumors about others when they are insecure about themselves. As far as the ppl coming up to you and asking if these rumor are true- a simple 'you should know me better then that' should suffice.People are making up false and damaging rumors about me?
    It's good that you have people who are willing to ask you rather than just believe and avoid you because of it. Continue to tell the true story and ignore the troublemakers. Tell the people who ask you if it's true if you're tired ';if you will believe that, you will believe anything';
    i understand about how damaging rumors can be. and its not always possible, or wanted!! to tell every one ur busines to set them straigth from the rumors. so ive foudn the best way for ur heart, and for the rumors to go away is laugh at them, and encourage them, when people come to u, make up a story even crazier with a twinkle in ur eye, and keep changing it, always making sure u use the same details as the rumors but make them crazy and unbelivable, then when people ask u about the crazy rumors jus have a big laugh and say nothing 鈾?werks liek a charm!!
    Don't let the know that they are winning. When people walk up to you telling you that they heard this and that ignore them. Make them feel stupid about themselves. Eventually the guys that have no lives would realize that they are not affecting you.
    Well that bites. The people who know you and are your friends, probably won't even believe the gossip...There isn't much you can really do if you have already spoken with these losers - Good luck to you!
    Stop acting like a victim. It's only a problem if you act like it is.

    Do u know facts pertaining to an actual case of false or unethical advertising that occurred in the Philippine?

    one example would be the glutathione that loren legarda endorsed then it was tested to have fake label.Do u know facts pertaining to an actual case of false or unethical advertising that occurred in the Philippine?
    EDSA endorsing Lucida-DS glutathione, a whitening capsule food supplement. Saw also this Sen. Ping Lacson ad endorsing Facial Care Centre for Men which i guess among others promote botox treatment and other facial skin enhancements and treatments. The problem is, these endorsers are politicians/presidentiables and not really movie or television personalities. These pols maybe celebrities in their own right but what if their endorsements are a subject of some controversy like in the case of Lucida-DS when ABS-CBN veteran broadcast journalist Korina Sanchez, reporting about Lucida-DS not having enough actual glutathione content as oppose to the indicateded glutathione amount being sold..btw, Korina Sanchez boyfriend, Sen. Mar Roxas is also a declared presidentiable in 2010.

    Can anyone give me a full book summary of False Impression by Jeffrey Archer?

    I was supposed to read the book False Impression by Jeffrey Archer for summer reading. I got the book from the library and had to return it with only finishing 70 pages. and they won't even let me renew it because there is a waiting list. Can someone PLEASE help me? Can you give me a detailed summary of the book? or give me the link to a site that does it for me? I can't find a site for it.





    If anyone can do that for me, i will definitely choose you as the best answer!Can anyone give me a full book summary of False Impression by Jeffrey Archer?
    http://www.jeffreyarcherbooks.com/titlep鈥?/a>





    http://www.januarymagazine.com/features/鈥?/a>





    http://www.mostlyfiction.com/spy-thrille鈥?/a>Can anyone give me a full book summary of False Impression by Jeffrey Archer?
    i'm sorry, but i don't take bribe attemts. just borrow the book from a friend, they proably did it already are more than happy to help you out... NO CHEATING!!!


    Good Luck!!!
    http://www.sparknotes.com





    Then search the book with title and maybe author. Spark Notes is great for everything. Consider it your personal lit tutor.
    Sorry, 10 points not worth helping you cheat (although obviously not everyone believes in that -- too bad, what they are teaching you is horrible!). Just read the book ... there are plenty of copies out there. I don't feel sorry for you because you had at least two weeks to read it. And it's really too bad because I DID read it and it's a GREAT book!
  • internet security software
  • How long can false labor last for?

    Iam 38 weeks pregnant and im starting to have contractions about every 15 mins. i know this is false labor because they only last for less than 20 seconds and they arent increasing in pain. how long can this go on for, thanxHow long can false labor last for?
    it can go on for days.


    i am 39 weeks and i have been having them since 37How long can false labor last for?
    I have been in false labor since yesterday around 10 AM. the doctor told me to walk around a lot and that will help turn the BH into real contractions that help to dilate your cervix.
    well until real labor starts actually I've been having contractions too but they aren't regular either so my doctor says it will still be awhile.

    How common are false negatives in pregnancy tests?

    i have been dizzy and a little nauseous (which isn't normal for me) constipated, which really isn't normal for me, and my period is over a week late. i took a test the second day i missed my period, and two days later, both were negative. possible reasons for this is what?





    i am a diabetic, and i have severe frequent urination, which i was told may mean my urine was too diluted. is that true? i still haven't started, i had some discharge when it was due, but nothing else. any ideas?How common are false negatives in pregnancy tests?
    There actually pretty common. Possible reason is that the hormone is high enough to be detected. Blood Test would be good.How common are false negatives in pregnancy tests?
    They are not very common. The test is like 99% accurate. Could be lots of stuff. Stress,Flu, PCOS. PCOS is common in diabetic women.

    Is Oprah the false prophet making the way for the Antichrist or Obama?

    There are many false prophets. I don't think she is THE false prophet. She is definitely propagating lies. Is Oprah the false prophet making the way for the Antichrist or Obama?
    wake up people this is a reality check oprah does not believe in jesus christ,and has came up with her new earth church lies decieving alot of people on top of that she introduced obama to the world and he is a member of her church that does not believe in jesus and she has 5 million followers.

    Report Abuse


    Is Oprah the false prophet making the way for the Antichrist or Obama?
    I've said this jokingly over a year ago that Obama was the antichrist and Oprah the false prophet. Now, I'm wondering if I wasn't too far off base at least regarding Oprah. Oprah is now considered the most influential woman in entertainment. She is espousing her new age theology and deceiving many people. Time will tell. We know for certain that she fits in the category of an antichrist with her new age gobbledygook of philosophy.
    opera believes she is her own god she comes to the island i live on 3 or 4 times a year as her spiritual guide lives here. i was watching one episode years ago and opera was discussing shoes and fashion and getting questions from the crowd she went to this white woman and asked her what she felt abut the things that she has seen today (meaning on the show) but the woman stood up and said there should only be one religion the human religion and sat back down i was floored that she even said it since it had nothing to do with the show but i wonder why i got a thumbs down as i did not lie
    I doubt that. She just a really annoying talk show host who tries to force feed her politic views down her audience throats. I lost a lot of respect for those celebrities who endorsed political parties this year. Matt Damon, George Clooney, etc... These people are actors and singers or whatever. Not experts in political science
    Hello,





    No but my main criticism of Oprah and other celebrities is that they donate and do charities so all the world can see this and the Bible instructs us to do this sort of thing in secret or all the work and effort will be negated.





    Cheers,





    Michael Kelly
    Oprah is a talk show host, who likes books and ice cream. Obama wants to help the country and get us out of war. How of are those to evil? People do listen two Oprah to much, she is a little dangerous in that respect.
    Don't know about Obama, but she is definitely off track with the new age junk!! She knows better. Wonder how much more ';steal, kill, and destroy '; she would like to enjoy.
    and I think Elvis is involved somehow . . . .
    Get over losing the elections already.
    Probably not.
    Ah..hahahahahahaha...oh wait, you were serious..oh sorry.
    Oprah is a rich woman.
    I don't see either of them as ';false prophets';.
    I get you dont like them, but dont you think its a bit stupid to classify them under Anti-Christ?
    Yes, kill the infidel!
    Sure what ever.. Sounds like something I'd see in the Globe or National Enquirer
    Quit being Rah.....t@rted! Bush is the BEAST!
    why not
    Probably.





    Edit: This isn't a serious question is it?

    Possible to get false negative twelve times?

    Is it possible to get a false negative twelve times during the first four or five months of pregnancy or are chances good that the tests are right and there really is no pregnancy?Possible to get false negative twelve times?
    No. If you have had 12 negative pregnancy tests, you are more than likely not pregnant.Possible to get false negative twelve times?
    You are not pregnant, if you were five months pregnant you would be feeling your baby move. All of your other questions state that your period has been on time every month. Just because a woman has unprotected sex it does not guarantee you will get pregnant, couples that are actually trying and timing sex during ovulation only have a 20% of conceiving in a given month.
    No. I mean, it's not 100% impossible but really close to it. If you want to completely be certain, get a blood test. Go to your local planned parenthood or clinic if you don't have insurane and some of them will do it free or really cheap. They go accoding to your income.
    MICHELLE I HIGHLY DOUBT THAT THE TESTS COULD BE WRONG TWELVE TIMES (BUT IT MIGHT DEPEND ON THE ACCURACY OF THE TEST) THATS LIKE THE DIFFERENCE FROM BUYING A TEST AT CVS AND ONE FROM THE REALLY CHEAP DOLLAR STORES LOL!!! BUT TO BE SURE YOU REALLY SHOULD SEE UR DOCTOR=-}
    No, dammit.


    Chances are you're psyching yourself out so much you actually convinced your body you're pregnant. If you're so concerned, go get a blood test. Jesus, 12 negatives? I'd say you're VERY un-pregnant.
    That would be a really rare and strange occurence. If you have not had a period in that length of time I'd go to the doctor. You could have something else going on.
    Why do you think you're pregnant? If you were four or five months pregnant, you'd be showing....you need to go to a doctor.
    I don't think it really is possible. I think that's a bad test, and you should try again with a different brand.
    after 12 times i would say the test is right, go see a doctor if you think something may be wrong.
    im sure it is remotely possible, but very highly doubtful. if you're concerned, get a blood test.
    no maybe the levels are too low to show in the urine but can be tested by blood, so i suggest you get a blood test done.
    Go to your doctor. Your chances aren't the best, but I suppose it's still possible.
    Sorry, but you are not pregnant.
    if you got a false that many times you're not pregnant sorry....
    NO
    You are not pregnant
    just get a blood test its a lot more acurate
    i doubt it
    Not really. if you are that concerned, get a blood test

    How do you keep excel from changing False to FALSE in all caps it does it everytime i type it in a box?

    put an apostraphe before the word (it wont show but it will tell excel its not a formulaHow do you keep excel from changing False to FALSE in all caps it does it everytime i type it in a box?
    Put a single apostrophe (') before the word. It won't display the apostrophe, but tells Excel that the information is just text, not an equation, sum, or data, and so won't change the text.

    After pulling a false nail off my finger 9 months ago, i now have a deep ridge. how do i get rid of it?

    the cuticle is also red near the ridge.After pulling a false nail off my finger 9 months ago, i now have a deep ridge. how do i get rid of it?
    It needs to grow out.After pulling a false nail off my finger 9 months ago, i now have a deep ridge. how do i get rid of it?
    Let it grow out naturally. Keep it filed to a reasonable length and if it starts to hurt, seek a doctor.
    yes it does need too grow out itself,but you can make it less noticeable by getting a BUFFER!


    There are 3 sides too them..some look just like a file and some are shaped a little different!


    But you use the one side,then you go too the next side and finally you buff.


    Nails come out real shiny and VERY healthy looking.


    Not much at the drug store.
    You need to see a dermatologist fake nails are dangerous you could have gotten a bad infection like Herpes ,
    You Most Likley have a ingrown nail, you should visit a doctor or a person who gets rid of them my older sister gets them all the time..
    I have those in both of my thumbnails, and even when they grow out, another one just comes in. All I can say is to just let it grow out.
    You need to let the nail grow back naturally. Try some nail hardener in the mean time.
  • internet security software
  • Who would excommunicate the pope if he was teaching false doctrine?

    thats a good question I guess the cardinals would have to burn him at the stake for HerecyWho would excommunicate the pope if he was teaching false doctrine?
    A Synod of Bishops. Actually, if you read about the Great Schism, this is exactly what happened, only the Eastern Bishops who wanted to excommunicate the pope didn't have the votes, so afterwards they just broke away. But, that's how it's done. They have to come together, and vote. Much like the House of Representatives would censure a President of the US.Who would excommunicate the pope if he was teaching false doctrine?
    Since they have been teaching false doctrines from the founding of the church in the 3rd century, it appears that no one cares, as long as they get a cut of the gross.
    The Council of Paul I guess.

    Anyone have a false negative with the CBE digital HPT?

    We are TTC %26amp; I am now 3 days late, I took 2 CBE digital tests (one the day i missed my period %26amp; one this morning) and both came back ';not pregnant';. I plan on getting a different HPT and retesting, just cuious if this happened to anyone else %26amp; their outcome. Thanks!Anyone have a false negative with the CBE digital HPT?
    Well that could be possible. I took 2 CBE digital tests and they gave me false positives! Danm them! I am going to use a different brand this month! Good luck and baby dust to you XX!Anyone have a false negative with the CBE digital HPT?
    Nope I took one two weeks late and it said NOT PREGNANT and I wasn't. So they are very accurate. Good luck.
    I think I heard something about that...check out www.peeonastick.com and look in their digital tests section.

    Is it worth it to sue a store for False Advertising?

    A store has a advertisement that says: 4 for $10 General Mills Cereal 11.5-16 oz, I bought 4 boxes of General Mills Cereal, I bought a 16 oz box of Multigrain Cheerios, a 15 oz box of regular Cheerios, and two boxes of Total that weight 12 oz each. All fitting the requirements. They charged me regular price. The manager says that the only General Mills Cereal on sale is Kix, Cheerios,and Honey Nut Cheerios. The Cheerios is only 10 oz.Is it worth it to sue a store for False Advertising?
    Lawyers cost hundreds of dollars an hour. A court judgment at best would cover the 4 or 5 bucks you should have saved with the cereal. It is far cheaper and faster to just start shopping at a different store.Is it worth it to sue a store for False Advertising?
    what u should do is find the add and then show the add 2 the manager and point out the fact that u do have all the requirements but i wouldn't sue over a little thing like that plus if u did happen 2 loose look at all that money u just lost
    No. You haven't incurred any damages. The store would have accepted a return on your purchases. The advertising sounds misleading, but in a nominal way.
    You have to ask yourself one question, ';is it cost effective for me to sue for that';???? In some cases it could be to your benefit (depends on the items/value), but not for your situation.
    It would hardly seem worth it to me unless you're planning on claiming emtional damage and asking for punitive damages.
    You would sue over miscommunication of which cereals are on sale? Did you read the fine print? If anything, this is a perfect example of a store manager having no clue about customer service. If there is a paying customer buying tons of a product because you've advertised it as being on sale, give the customer a pass this time on the fine print and allow the sale price. Poor customer service, sure, but not grounds to sue. The cost of filing in small claims court is far more than the extra money you spent on the cereal.

    Which one is false among these statements?

    1. The one which has no equivalence has no identity.


    2. The one which has no difference has no identity.





    Of 1 and 2, which one is false? Why?Which one is false among these statements?
    1潞=False





    Being equivalent to other things, gives you their adjectives so you stop being what you weren't that of now you are equivalent to, so you become what is equivalent to you, and if everything were equivalent (same), ';everything will be everything';, but now how can you tell what is not part of the everything, so the answer comes in: ';what gives you identity is what you ARE, but at the same time, what you AREN'T';





    2潞=True (obviously)





    So the 1潞's answer gives the 2潞's answer, who/that which IS can be identified between which it ISN'T.Which one is false among these statements?
    same like my 10 turtles haha haha haha....that's why no 1 usually always die first then no 2. therefore 10 turtles - 1 turtles = 9 turtles.





    why so stupid? lol....finally arrived at 9552009 hahha





    9 turtles, 5th may 2009 since u singapore government doggies love to play with me. imao.





    congrats Lee and son doggies are cleanse on the ways. haha haha haha





    5th May 2009 up to 2359hrs or 11.59pm. anymore after 2359hrs or 11.59pm are invalid liao lor. hee hee....oh u may use western day if u wan to recover the one turtle for u all doggies. imao....but 2359hrs or 11.59 pm still apply. lol.





    i dun play pple, it is the pple who always play me. lol.....
    2 is false due to the definition of identity.
    Depends but # 2 is more unto it as in our differences... it gives us our identity as individuals but as a whole, OUR identity will go through our physical forms by distinctions... like an erectus.
    Number 1 is false. One can not have identity if there is no difference from others. If one were equal to all others there would a single identity but one could not see where one began or ended.
    lol wei xiao bao...one pple can deal an population of est'd 5 millions pple in Singapore. What a big shame.....so many pple vs just u. imao...which it is not included overseas doggies pple too. haha haha haha
    Number one. A person or a tree Can be outstanding in their field

    I thought there was no such thing as a false positive?

    I took a pregnancy test friday morning, and the result was positive. The line was very faint but it was definitely there. Now 3 days later i got my period and am so disappointed. I went to to doctor and he did a test and it came out neg. Why did this happen?I thought there was no such thing as a false positive?
    Sounds like a chemical pregnancy to me. I had one in February. Three positives and then I had a really bad period. I cried and stayed home from work and stopped trying all together to get pregnant. I now tell everyone to wait until you are at least a week late because of the horrible disaapointment I felt. I am now 8w4d pregnant. You're more fertile after a chemical pregnancy, or so my doctor says. Don't give up. Just relax and have sex for fun and it will happen. It worked for me. I had given up and now I have my first ultrasound pic. Good luck.I thought there was no such thing as a false positive?
    Did the line appear with in the time stated? If you didn't notice the line until after then an evaporation line can appear.





    With out sounding horrible, it could be a wishfull thinking line. If you stare at a test long enough you can convince yourself that there is a line. My friend was convinced she had a positive test but I didn't see any line.





    Sorry.





    Good luck for next month.
    I had the exact same thing happen to me just a few weeks ago . I know how disappointing and painful it is.


    Its the most common kind of miscarriage. Simply , the egg is fertilized but for some reason the body rejects it and its all passes out . It feels and looks like a really bad period.





    I mean I can't tell you that's for sure why but thats what it sounds like.I'm very curious to why you're doctor didn't tell you that. I saw my OBGYN and she said it happens in 1 of every 3 pregnancies. And it doesn't usually effect your chance of having a healthy baby later on.





    But when I went back to my Dr. after my ';period'; my test was negative. ( It was positive when she checked 3 days earlier.)


    I
    All a pregnancy test measures is a certain hormone. If it is somewhat elevated due to any circumstance, diet, stress or something else it may detect it slightly and give you a positive. This prob. also explains why it was faint and not a bold mark on the test. Good luck trying to have kids...they are great.
    false positives are so rare that there are no known cases that i know of or reports on websites either from what i have read...if your period was ';late'; it just might not have been late and you could have been pregnant and had a chemical pregnancy which is exactly what i think it was since u got a pos and a few days later got ur ';period'; what happened was it was most likely a very early miscarriage..for some reason the fertilized egg didnt stick to your uterine wall when it prepared it for pregnancy (which is why we get our periods every month) ...so the egg didnt stick and it just flowed out with what you thought was a late period....i would try getting a blood test just in case...since many women still get their periods and can still be pregnant....i wish u many blessings and hope that you still are hun...





    good luck!
    hmm.. i heard there was no such thing as a false positive as well, could be that the line wasnt really there, or that it was there before you took it and you didnt see it, maybe it was suppose to get darker, or that it was a defective test, it is possible that it was broken..
    You may have had what is called a chemical pregnancy, or a very early miscarriage. There was enough of the hormone in your system to get the positive test, but it was probably declining that that point. Sorry for your loss.
    You could of had a very early miscarriage they do say a lot of us dont even know we have miscarried as we have had our period a few days late..





    Really sorry to hear that, hope you get better luck next month
    The term ';False positive'; wouldn't exist if it didn't happen. A false positive can come from a defect in the manufacturing, to leaving the test sitting too long.
    You probably had a chemical pregnancy. Which is a really early misscarriage. I am so so sorry.
    maybe it was a cheap test.. They have those a lot. You have to get the best one out there. And take like three just to make sure.
    Because the first was a false positive. (Yes, Virginia, there is such things as false positives).
    default test or you had a chemical pregancy where the baby does not attach to the uterus ..sorry this happened to you hun.. good luck for next month
    false positives are possible they are just not common.. Im sorry that happened to you =/
    Sorry that happened just keeping trying................i know it's hard to stay positive





    Hopefully you will have better luck this month!!!!





    Lots of baby dust to everyone TTC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    No one ever said that, they happen just rarely... You may have had a chemical pregnancy or called a early miscarriage..
    There is a such thing. If a lie is told to make things better, than that is a false positive
    i never heard of that happening before.
    Those tests are not 100% accurate. Sorry to hear that there's no bundle of joy for you this month. The good news is that it's fun trying!

    What do you think of men who rape by lying about their income; misleading women with false affluence?

    That's not rape, that's just sex under false pretenses 鈥?presumably, with gold-diggers.





    EDIT: It doesn't count. She consented to the sexual act. The only way it could conceivably be called rape is if he threatened her.What do you think of men who rape by lying about their income; misleading women with false affluence?
    It's not rape. why do you keep calling things rape that are not? What is your purpose?What do you think of men who rape by lying about their income; misleading women with false affluence?
    rape is bad...
    I know that if a woman is shallow enough to have sex with a man based solely on his income she needs to be prepared for the possibility of deception.





    I also know that what you described is not rape.
    I think they are very sad.





    As are women who are impressed by a man's income.
    I actually work in wall-street and i can **** any girl i want.
  • internet security software
  • How many pancakes does it take to change a flat tire on the moon? True or False?

    Depends on if it's farther to L.A. or by bus. Never have gotten a satisfactory answer to that question either!How many pancakes does it take to change a flat tire on the moon? True or False?
    The answer is ORANGE?!?!? Wow! I figured it was either the answer I listed here or there are no tires in Bedrock....thanks for giving the right answer I won't forget it ;o)

    Report Abuse


    How many pancakes does it take to change a flat tire on the moon? True or False?
    Ten silver dollar pancakes.


    True!
    E. All of the above.
    479 Trillion. False
    false
    pancakes? what? As long as there's maple syrup it takes 3. If you put that powdered sugar crap on it, 4,254,584 pancakes.
    true

    How likely or unlikely is it to get a false positive on a preg test and...?

    what does it usually mean? How likely or unlikely is it to get a false positive on a preg test and...?
    Very unlikely, like 0.09% chance. When that happens is because either you had a really early miscarriage or that you are taking some hormone therapy for fertility or you like just gave birth.


    So if you have BFP consider yourself preggers unless the things above apply.How likely or unlikely is it to get a false positive on a preg test and...?
    well u can got false positive any medinice or drugs.. if u dont hav any of it then its confirm positive cos u can't get false positive if u dont hav any medinice or drugs





    mostly is got false negative cos they dont pick their pregnancy HGC level
    It's more likely that you will get a false negative. False positives are rare since the test detects the pregnancy hormone.

    In 2 Timothy 3:1-5, what does ';have a form of godly devotion but prove false to its power'; mean?

    @ 2 Timothy 3:1-5. It talks about personality traits that people would demonstrate in the ';last days';. Of special interest is the notation in vs. 5 -- it says people would ';have a form of godly devotion but prove false to its power';. What do you think that means?In 2 Timothy 3:1-5, what does ';have a form of godly devotion but prove false to its power'; mean?
    Compare these verses:





    2 Cor 11:13-15:


    For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.








    Titus 1:6


    They profess that they know God; but in works they deny [him], being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.In 2 Timothy 3:1-5, what does ';have a form of godly devotion but prove false to its power'; mean?
    I'm pretty sure it alludes to those who claim to be godly but don't live up to it.


    There are a lot of people in the church that only say they are Christians and even pray, but live a life that is very far removed from biblical values. There are 'godly' men who abuse they're wives and preachers who have affairs and clergy that molest children.There are tele-evangalists who rip people off thousands of dollars by manipulating tithes and offerings. In the churches I used to go to there was as much back biting and gossip as there was in any secular club. One would think that godly people would be different being devoted to God and all.


    These type of people have a form of Godly devotion and 'prove false to it's power because they are obviously not 'practicing what they preach'


    This was initially the reason I left the whole church scene.
    The proper rendition of that verse that is closest to the original Greek is: ';Having a form of godliness but denying the power.';





    This applies to people who appear to be godly or claim to be godly but they have no personal relationship with God and deny His power to do what He says He will do and conversely their lives are powerless as well in the spiritual realm.
    I think it is a warning against smugness in one's beliefs. Christians can be..well...arrogant. I think it comes down to the difference between humbly and compassionately praying for a person and that passive/aggressive ';I'll pray for your soul'; that many Christians employ to express distaste with another persons actions or beliefs.
    Religion changes the character of people. The power of piety sometimes includes the power to heal. We see the form of religion in people trying to please their communities by appearing to be pious but deep inside they really are weak and easily tempted.
    They look like ';power Christians'; but their doctrines reveal them as fakes.
    ';Wolves in sheep's clothing';. ';They'; can 'act' the part but behind closed doors they are 'different'.
    It means that they give lip service to the faith, but they don't walk in it.
    It means that some will know of God but not know God.

    The Monkees: Were they serious or were they a false group?

    I know there was a tv show so I was wondering if their songs and group were just for that or were they really a group who did tours and things?The Monkees: Were they serious or were they a false group?
    The Monkees was a pop-rock quartet created in Los Angeles in 1965 for the American television series The Monkees, which aired from 1965 to 1968.


    The primary members were Micky Dolenz, Davy Jones, Michael Nesmith, and Peter Tork, who were the public face of a music production system under the supervision of Don Kirshner.





    At the start, the band members provided vocals, and were given some performing and production opportunities, but they eventually fought for and earned the right to collectively supervise all musical output under the band's name.





    On their third album, Headquarters (produced by Chip Douglas and issued in May 1967), the four Monkees wrote and played on much of their own material. Nearly all vocals and instruments on Headquarters were performed by the four Monkees.The album shot to No. 1, but was quickly eclipsed by a milestone cultural event when the Beatles released Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band.





    After the television show was cancelled, Rafelson directed the four Monkees in a feature film, Head, originally titled ';Untitled.'; The film was executive-produced by Schneider and co-written and co-produced by Rafelson with a then relatively unknown Jack Nicholson. Rumors abound that the title was chosen in case a sequel was made. The advertisements would supposedly have read: ';From the people who gave you HEAD.'; [5]





    Nicholson also assembled the film's soundtrack album. The film, conceived and edited in a stream of consciousness style, featured oddball cameo appearances by movie stars Victor Mature, Annette Funicello, a young Teri Garr, boxer Sonny Liston, famous stripper Carol Doda, and musician Frank Zappa. It was filmed in Screen Gems Studios and on location in California, Utah, and The Bahamas between 19 February and May 17, 1968 and premiered in New York City on November 6 of that year (the film later debuted in Hollywood on November 20).





    Head was not a commercial success, in part because it was the antithesis of The Monkees television show, intended to comprehensively demolish the group's carefully-groomed public image. Rafelson and Nicholson's ';Ditty Diego-War Chant'; (recited at the start of the film by the Monkees), ruthlessly parodies Boyce and Hart's ';Monkees Theme.'; A sparse advertising campaign (with no mention of the Monkees) squelched any chances of the film doing well, and it played only briefly in nearly-empty cinemas. In commentary for the DVD release, Nesmith said that by this time, everyone associated with the Monkees, including the four Monkees, ';had gone crazy.'; They were each using the platform of the Monkees to push their own disparate career goals, to the detriment of the Monkees project. Indeed, Nesmith said, Head was Rafelson and Nicholson's intentional effort to ';kill'; the Monkees, so that they would no longer be bothered with having to deal with the matter. Tork said in DVD commentary that everyone had developed such difficult personalities that the big-name stars invited as guests on the show would invariably leave the experience ';hating everybody.';





    Over the intervening years Head has developed a cult following for its innovative style and anarchic humor, and the soundtrack album (long out of print, but re-released by Rhino in the '80s and now available in an expanded CD version) is counted among their most adventurous recordings. Members of the Monkees, Nesmith in particular, cite Head (the first Monkees album not to include any Boyce and Hart compositions) as one of the crowning achievements of the band. The highlights include the Goffin/King composition Porpoise Song.





    which i recomend you find


    its a great song











    The Monkees: Were they serious or were they a false group?
    They were a group that were hand picked for the TV show. No one knew the other in the group before that. They and the show became so popular, they DID tour and stay together a while. My fave was Davey.

    Who is really behind the (in my opinion false) perception that men like ultra-thin bodies on women?

    Yes, most men have an initial positive reaction to Victoria's Secret models and the like, but I think most of us would ultimately prefer at least 15 - 30 pounds more?Who is really behind the (in my opinion false) perception that men like ultra-thin bodies on women?
    Fashion industry.


    Most of people there are too detached from reality.





    My guess it that models are supposed to look good in pictures, not feel good when you hug them.Who is really behind the (in my opinion false) perception that men like ultra-thin bodies on women?
    IN the UK we know men prefer curvy women. But the whole reason women want to be a size zero is to impress other women that's the only reason.
    Hollywood(though H.wood is starting to put more ';fleshy'; women in leading roles that aren't for comedic relief or have tragic life stories), the fashion industry and the women's magazines that use the ultra thin models in their ads and place them next to articles about how to get a man, keep a man, and please a man, and use the thin models for what fashions are ';in';. If the fashions that were ';in'; were put on women of all body types instead of mostly the thin models, there might be less confusion in that respect.
    The fashion industry and Hollywood. We fail to remember that the fashion industry is dominated by men who like other men so it makes sense that they would eshew curves. Vickies isn't the worst of the bunch and actually deserve a little bit of credit as does SI. They have long had standards for their models that other companies/publications didn't with regard to being too thin.
    It's primarily the fashion industry. They're only interested in selling clothes, so they want models as skinny as coat hangers so their clothing will hang well on them. The industry is all about the clothes, not the attractiveness of the women, but other women get the mistaken idea that men find that look desirable. We don't.
    I'm going to be politically incorrect here and say that I find Keira Knightley quite attractive. But I also find Freema Ageyman very beautiful. Women's beauty can come in many shapes, sizes, and colors, and I hope for everyone to be able to accept and value themselves for their uniqueness.
    It has nothing to do with men it's a woman thing. We are our own worst enemies and project these images onto men pointing proding the men askin, ';You thinks she's hot don't you?'; Once we promote more positive self-images then we can finally accept ourselves for who we are.


    Men like what feels good and the most attractive quality is confidence.
    There is nobody behind it other than all of us as consumers. If women (or men) objected to those images, then they would stop spending money at Victoria Secret, stop buying Cosmo magazine, stop watching the VS fashion shows (low viewership means less revenue). What matters is where people put their money. They are selling an illusion of beauty which women will try to project on themselves. Do you really think if they showed 200 lb women in bulky sweaters, women would suddenly flock to VS? Not likely.





    Well, Portwine, I'll take the skinny ones. Sure, instead of the 5'6'; 110 lb. model, you want the 140 lb one (added 30 lbs). Then after marriage or a LTR, she gains another 30 to be 170. Ah, but if I start with 110, then she'll be 140 after marriage. If you haven't noticed, many people gain weight after marriage or when in a LTR. It is much easier to be 110 going to 140 than to be 170 trying to get back down to 140.
    men
    I'm an assman. But no fat stomachs!!! Unless the a'ss sticks out more than the stomach.. to make up for it.. hehe
    I agree but with somen men, it seems like it's all about the breasts. Like people say how the women a skinny as a rail. Well yes they are rails, with big boobs. Meaning skinny, except for the curves up top. I like boobs as much as the next guy, but I like proportion. And while the Victoria's Secret girls are beauitul, they are soo tiny. There legs are so skinny, like girlish and not like a woman's. A like a woman's body and a booty to her, not huge, but something there. Meaning meat on the legs, and wide hips Many of the women actually do have natural breasts, but I do think they are exceptions considering how skinny they are to have such large breasts. Usually a woman has to have some meat on her bones or atleast not tiny like these women to have large breasts.
    Gay male fashion designers.





    And yes, AT LEAST 15 - 30 pounds more than those underfed models...
    when i was pregnant, i got hit on more than ever. seriously. one guy even asked me, ';do you have a baby daddy already?';





    my boyfriend has said over and over again that he found me most beautiful when i was pregnant. i don't really agree, but i think it shows that if you love the one you're with, you don't really agonize over their weight.
    I agree, it's the fashion industry, and they are detatched. I also agree that most men don't want to be stabbed by a protruding rib or elbow when they're close to a woman, that's not sexy at all.
    Any guy who wants a woman who looks like a little boy, has issues to deal with.





    Women, IMHO, should be women.





    Example: Kate Winslet
    I am not a man, but I agree, fashion industry, hollywood, television, etc....but the great thing is that REAL MEN in real life, at least in my experience, like real women.....all sizes and shapes. So while the media portrays ONE, in real life it's a variety. Women....yes WOMEN.....are much less flexible than men. (in my opinion)....WE want to be stick thin with big boobs, no blemishes etc....
    Blah Blah Blah... What it all comes down to is that if they had 10-15 extra ponds they'd get slammed for being cottage cheese. These girls are rock solid and I LOVE IT! As a woman I don't want to be that skinny but then again I don't have to strut my butt down a runway barely clothed and in high heels no less but they do. It's their living. Alessandra only trains like 3 times a month and confesses to eating chocolate every day. These girls are just blessed with long legs and skinniness mostly by nature. now their boobs are pulled and taped until they look large even though they are not. But yeah it's not just Hollywood it's people in general. If you're bigger you're invisible, I know I was there. WHen you have a waist to hip ratio (divide waist by hip size) of .70 you are the most attractive to men. Most of those girls are anywhere from .65-.74.( That's based on scientific research byt the way not personal opinion) I blame men but then my ratio is .71 so I can.
    jessica alba is what I prefer.
    God bless you - every one!





    :)
    They say they don't just to make you feel better. If a man tells a woman he likes more meat it means that he thinks they are fat but still wants to get laid.





    I knew I would get some thumbs down on that one.

    [TRUE OR FALSE]: The small nucleus of a paramecium is involved in a reproductive process called conjugation. ?

    I believe it is true since the micronucleus is involved in cell division, however I am not completely sure about the other portion of the statement.





    and also:


    Which of the following algae are only found in ponds?


    a) Dinoflagellates


    b) Euglena


    c) Green algae


    d) Paramecium


    e) None of the above





    I was thinking Euglena, but I'm not entirely sure.





    Thanks in advance ^^[TRUE OR FALSE]: The small nucleus of a paramecium is involved in a reproductive process called conjugation. ?
    well, hello there [: ,


    i would say true...


    and then b...[TRUE OR FALSE]: The small nucleus of a paramecium is involved in a reproductive process called conjugation. ?
    True-or so i read. lol





    and





    b. Euglena
  • private myspace
  • Tru or False (10 points) Can the General Assemby approve a proposed amendment to the constitution?

    by a 3/5 vote from its members, can the General Assembly approve an amendment to the U.S. Constitution??????Tru or False (10 points) Can the General Assemby approve a proposed amendment to the constitution?
    Anybody and his brother can ';approve'; of a proposed amendment.





    A ';proposed'; amendment can have 100% approval by the entire world but unless 38 states in the Republic of the United States votes affirmative for the change, it will never be part of the Constitution.





    The answer is true but the only approvals that count are the ones from 38 states.








    The Constitution provides four paths an amendment can take to become part of the Constitution.





    Proposal by Congress, ratification by state conventions (used once)





    Proposal by Congress, ratification by state legislatures (used all other times)





    Proposal by convention of states, ratification by state conventions (never used)





    Proposal by convention of states, ratification by state legislatures (never used)





    Notice that two paths don鈥檛 even mention the US federal government.








    Two paths originate with the states and all paths terminate with the states.








    The Federal government鈥檚 ability to change, access to and power over the Constitution is exactly the same as the General Assembly鈥︹€hich is no ability, no access and no power to change the Constitution of the United States of America. A vote of approval by Congress or the UN General Assembly is not binding on the states.





    Each of the states are free to reject any proposals from wherever they originate.Tru or False (10 points) Can the General Assemby approve a proposed amendment to the constitution?
    The General Assembly usually refers to the UN, which has no power whatsoever to approve or reject amendments to the U.S. Constitution.





    To Propose Amendments





    * Two-thirds of both houses of Congress vote to propose an amendment, or





    * Two-thirds of the state legislatures ask Congress to call a national convention to propose amendments. (This method has never been used.)





    To Ratify Amendments





    * Three-fourths of the state legislatures approve it, or





    * Ratifying conventions in three-fourths of the states approve it. This method has been used only once -- to ratify the 21st Amendment -- repealing Prohibition.





    shamelessly copied and pasted from
    There is no Federal general assembly. And the answer is NO. To amend the U.S. contitution, there is a very difficult and lengthy process. The process, in the end, requires 3/4 of the states to ratify the amendment.
    Yes they can. In order for the proposal to be enshrined in the constitution, it will also require the approval of 3/4 of the states.
    NO !





    Actually, the UN General Assembly can approve anything it wants, but something like this would be of no force or effect with respect to the US Constitution. A foreign body has no authority at all to change the US Constitution.
    No... It takes 2/3rds of *both* the House and Senate to *Propose* an amendment.. *THEN* 2/3rds of the States must vote to ratify the Amendment... The US has no General Assembly.
    Did your school really ask this as a True or False question or are you just rephrasing it incorrectly?
    False, They need 51% not 3/5.
    true.simple as that.
    No,


    but yes to 10 points ;)
    FALSE
    false :D
    Yes %26gt;%26gt;%26gt;%26gt;best answer%26lt;%26lt;%26lt;%26lt;%26lt;
    true, hands down, ture.

    Can Dramamine provide a false positive for anything else on a drug test?

    yes it happens

    Why did Jesus identify false teachers as kleptos - was He warning about thieves in the church?

    John 10:1 - Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.





    http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/鈥?/a>Why did Jesus identify false teachers as kleptos - was He warning about thieves in the church?
    Yep. (Just like satan's little followers, only to steal, kill, and destroy!)Why did Jesus identify false teachers as kleptos - was He warning about thieves in the church?
    Good point, but I think this means more to do with honesty than anything else. People try to go around, under and over the Cross of Calvary- but there is only one way- Through the Cross.
    What publication of the Bible do you have where Jesus calls false teachers kleptos? Woe unto thee, kleptos! I just don't see Jesus saying that. How would you translate kleptos into Aramaic?
    They try to snatch you out of The Father's hand. But, as you know, No one can snatch you out of The Father's hand! God Bless!
    people that falsely represent themselves maybe?

    How can you know if a claim is true or false in a hypothesis test?

    Using the Conference Interval Method and Critical Value Method(Statistics)How can you know if a claim is true or false in a hypothesis test?
    Ouch.





    (1) do you mean ';confidence interval method';





    (2) the short answer is that no statistical method can tell you if a claim is true or false.





    (3) what it can tell you is whether the data ';supports'; or ';does not support'; the claim.





    This is really important. you do need to understand that all you are dealing with is a probability that a claim is true. you can never know if it true for sure.

    What's The Best False Lashes Sold in Australia?

    What are the best quality yet still cheap eyelashes available in Australia?


    I want them to be natural looking so people aren't looking at my eyes thinking ';Hmm... Are they fake?';. But I also want them to be cheap but good quality.


    Brand names would be really great! :)





    Thanks!What's The Best False Lashes Sold in Australia?
    1000 hours from Priceline





    Ardell from Priceline





    QVS from Target, Big W, and KMart





    Getting more into the pricier end is #7 from MAC. But they are very natural looking, highly recommended.





    Each of these, you can use up to 10 times, if you take good care of them, make sure you remove all traces of glue and don't get them wet, or put mascara on them.





    HTH


    x from Perth

    Why are all those false prophets in the last 2,000 years are jealous of Jesus Christ?

    Could it be that Jesus was God's son.Why are all those false prophets in the last 2,000 years are jealous of Jesus Christ?
    Plus the Bible says there will come many false prophets.Why are all those false prophets in the last 2,000 years are jealous of Jesus Christ?
    Islam honors all the prophets who were sent to mankind. Muslims respect all prophets in general, but Jesus in particular, because he was one of the prophets who foretold the coming of Muhammad. Muslims, too, await the second coming of Jesus. They consider him one of the greatest of GOD's prophets to mankind. A Muslim does not refer to him simply as ';Jesus,'; but normally adds the phrase ';peace be upon him'; as a sign of respect.





    No other religion in the world respects and dignifies Jesus as Islam does. The Quran confirms his virgin birth (a chapter of the Quran is entitled ';Mary';), and Mary is considered to have been one of the purest women in all creation. The Quran describes Jesus' birth as follows:





    ';Behold!' the Angel said, God has chosen you, and purified you, and chosen you above the women of all nations.';[Noble Quran 3:42]





    ';Mary, God gives you good news of a word from Him, whose name shall be the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, honored in this world and in the Hereafter, and one of those brought near to God. He shall speak to the people from his cradle and in maturity, and he shall be of the righteous. She said: ';My Lord! How shall I have a son when no man has touched me?' He said: ';Even so; God creates what He will. When He decrees a thing, He says to it, 'Be!' and it is.';[Noble Quran 3:45-47]





    Muslims believe that Jesus was born immaculately, and through the same power which had brought Eve to life and Adam into being without a father or a mother.





    ';Truly, the likeness of Jesus with God is as the likeness of Adam. He created him of dust, and then said to him, 'Be!' and he was.';[Noble Quran 3:59]





    During his prophetic mission, Jesus performed many miracles. The Quran tells us that he said:





    ';I have come to you with a sign from your Lord: I make for you out of clay, as it were, the figure of a bird, and breathe into it and it becomes a bird by God's leave. And I heal the blind, and the lepers, and I raise the dead by God's leave.';[Noble Quran 3:49]





    Muhammad and Jesus, as well as the other prophets, were sent to confirm the belief in one God. This is referred to in the Quran where Jesus is reported as saying that he came:





    ';To attest the law which was before me, and to make lawful to you part of what was forbidden you; I have come to you with a sign from your Lord, so fear God and obey me.';[Noble Quran 3:50]





    Prophet Muhammad emphasized the importance of Jesus by saying: ';Whoever believes there is no god but GOD, alone without partner, that Muhammad is His messenger, that Jesus is a servant and messenger of God, His word breathed into Mary and a spirit emanating from Him, and that Paradise and Hell are true, shall be received by God into Heaven.[Bukhari]
    Are you sure they are jealous? Or do you assumed so?
  • private myspace
  • Plants and animals benefit from nitrogen-fixing bacteria True or False?

    True.


    Eg -legume plants have root nodules containing nitrogen fixing genes - thre plants clearly benefit and so do the consumers of the plants.

    HPV Vaccince lead to false positive pregnancy test?

    I recieved the 3rd and final HPV vaccine the other day. I'm about a week and a half late on my period so I did a home pregnancy test. Any chance that the vaccine could of lead to a false positive?





    P.S. The missed period could also be lead from the stress of moving across the world. I also recieved the flu mist and the anthrax vaccine on the same day.HPV Vaccince lead to false positive pregnancy test?
    Umm.. the only false positive in pregnancy test is called a 'chemical pregnancy'.. where the egg is fertilized but does not implant in the uterus. Thus ending in a period. That is all that I have heard of. I do not think at all that an hpv shot would do anything to create a false positive in a home pregnancy test. the only reason a test would come back positive is if there was significant amount of hCG... even in a chemical pregnancy there are levels of hCG because it it fertilized, just not implanted. Idk why I'm blabbing.. I hope this helped a little. Good luck if your wanting to expect, and if not, I hope it's false. :)HPV Vaccince lead to false positive pregnancy test?
    No, if it said positive then you are indeed pregnant.
    Nope, you're pregnant. If you got a positive, that is.
    Nope, you are pregnant.
    uhhh no, sorry