True or false All standard scientific evidence shows that there is no requirement for a God for the life?

what do you think about this its true or false


All standard scientific evidence shows that there is no requirement for a God for the life and world we live in.True or false All standard scientific evidence shows that there is no requirement for a God for the life?
True - All scientific evidence so far shows that there is no requirement for God for life or the world.





Any scientific evidence showing that God would be needed would be classed as evidence for Gods existence. As no one who says this statement is false can name this evidence, this shows that God is not needed.





There are many people who do not understand the scientific theories, but just because they do not understand it, does not mean that it must be Gods doing.True or false All standard scientific evidence shows that there is no requirement for a God for the life?
False. Science observes objects, makes predicitions, gathers empirical evidence to support theories surrounding those predicitions. It does this very well.





Spiritual traditions are concerned with a felt sense that each individual has that is different from any other. The concept of and symbol of God is a structure that helps a person understand that unique felt sense they have within that science has no tools to address.





Science and spiritual traditions do not conflict, they complement each other like object and subject respectively. It is people that create conflicts between the two.
False. Even the study of abiogenesis proves nothing. People don't consider the fact that when attempting to prove abiogenesis, scientists are physically combining elements already in existence, and stimulating them directly. It only proves that humans are smart. It doesn't prove that a God wasn't involved with life existing. Would the amino acids formed by the experiments have existed, if the scientists hadn't made it so?





It reminds me of that joke where some scientists tell God they can create humans from dirt too, and when they go to do so, God tells them to create their own dirt.





Abiogenesis is such that it can't be proven, because it involves a scientist's influence.





So again, false.
Evidence often suggests that there _is_ a god, goddess, or gods, or some other force at work.





There is no evidence that supports life being generated spontaneously, only unproven (and untestable) hypothesized ideas (which do not meet the requirements of empirical science).





(A)Biogenesis is a neat idea, but unproven*. All testing has failed, simply because we do not know the process.





Additionally, it is not implausible that God uses the same principles that we attempt to explain (as theories) in His works.





There is no good argument against God, just as there is no way that empirical science can prove there is no God.





It is all a matter of perspective and opinion.





*Unproven in the sense that the life created could sustain itself and evolve... The ';life force'; was lacking.
True.





Although questions have been raised scientifically such as how the universe began, it is not standard science to say that a higher metaphysical being must have created it. Everything that happens has an explanation or at least a theory which does not include any god.
I have to disagree with the wording of your statement.





It is not the job of Science to prove or disprove the ';requirement for a God.'; If Science is not looking for such a requirement, the fact that such a requirement has not been found proves nothing.





If I am not looking for a missing sock, does the fact that I haven't found it necessarily mean that the sock doesn't exist?
Science [Scientific Evidence] cannot show whether a God is necessary for life or the world we live in. It is not a Scientific question.


Science starts with the premise [quite a good one, too, for what it is] that we can observe, analyze, and learn how things work.


This is, of course, true, up to a point.
False. Science cannot get around the fact that the universe needs a beginning. But something had to get it started. But they come up with all kinds of reasons and hypotheses to reason God out. But all fail. Some, like Steven Hawking even lie in their theories. But the truth always bears out. And one day science will have to recant most of their notions.
That is false. Actually the opposite is true. Science is showing that there had to be a life giver, first cause, intelligent designer or what ever you want to call it. We call Him the Almighty Creator, Living God, Maker of the universe. If you want a name this scripture will help.


(Psalm 83:18) 18聽That people may know that you, whose name is Jehovah, You alone are the Most High over all the earth.
scientific data with science, and faith with spiritual belief are mutually exclusive.





http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/200鈥?/a>





No one would even touch this debate. Except people who dont understand science, and people are arent secure in thier faith.
There has yet to be discovered any law of nature or fact of life requiring the existence of supernatural creators or other magical entities. So that would be ';true';.
True. But there is no proof AGAINST one. That's what faith is about. Belief, even without evidence.





I am atheist, however. But I respect others choice of religion.
False. Science is the study of the natural universe in natural terms. Science can make no valid statements one way of the other about anything supernatural.
Science has no idea what created life, so scientific stands shows that no logical explanation can explain life so God is the plausible explanation at this time.
True; there is no requirement, just as there is no preclusion.
That has been obvious for a long time to the most intelligent, educated and objective people who do not allow emotions to rule them.
No one has ever found evidence that life couldn't possibly come about through natural processes.
True. Miller-Urey experiment showed that.
true? Lol i hope you're not one of those crazy religious people who think we do need god for science. Even if we haven't explained everything, we certainly will.
Its false, Creation is at the start of every process, and in order to Create one needs a Creator..
absolutely true
Correct!
It is 100% true and people have known that for a LONG time. It's not new.
Is this news to ANYONE?





Wow.
Totally false!!!





If our earth and universe was millions or billions of years old, at the rate that our sun is using up it's fuel, it would have gone out long ago.





Intelligence cannot come from non-intellegence. Everything that was ever make came about through creation by one that is more Intelligent than the thing being created.





The reason that there are so many missing links is because they were never there to begin with.





I think it is very revealing when evolutionary scientists admit that evolution is an unprovable theory, but they don' like the alternative.
This is false because even Richard Dawkins stated that if ';aliens'; or ';extraterrestrials'; were to come to earth they would probably be viewed as ';God'; or ';gods.'; Many scientist think in this manner.





Just because your a scientist doesn't mean your anti god. Most scientist just want the hard evidence. They are mostly like agnostics.
we are humans, there are things we cannot control, like when a parent finds out his child has cancer,he needs a god,he needs to feel that there is hope, that there is a power that might help his child live, thats all.. god is a figment of imagination. like a teddy bear that a child holds onto, or a safety blanket.





god is nothing but hope,its ur inner strength,ur belief .
False.


I thought so . . . as if they have answered all life's questions . . .an they haven't, I think you know that. But look at those who would think that science has come that far!





With those who would say science knows this; they cannot really be that into science. Maybe the word ';science';, but no where near the information about what they know, and what they don't know.
False, science is based off of Theories (Educated Opinion) until they are prove to be factual. There are many things in this universe that as humans we do not comprehend or understand.
false





there is no evidence for evolution





its made up theories with no factual evidence
absolutely FALSE